The Truth of Tibetan Buddhism

简体 | 正體 | EN | GE | FR | SP | BG | RUS | JP | VN                 The Truth of Tibetan Buddhism Home | GUEST BOOK | LOGIN | LOGOUT

Sexual scandals of Lamas and Rinpoches

über die Dalai Lamas

Before Buddhism was brought to Tibet, the Tibetans had their believes in "Bon". "Bon" is a kind of folk beliefs which gives offerings to ghosts and gods and receives their blessing. It belongs to local folk beliefs.

In the Chinese Tang Dynasty, the Tibetan King Songtsän Gampo brought “Buddhism” to the Tibetan people which became the state religion. The so-called “Buddhism” is Tantric Buddhism which spreads out during the final period of Indian Buddhism. The Tantric Buddhism is also named "left hand tantra" because of its tantric sexual practices. In order to suit Tibetan manners and customs, the tantric Buddhism was mixed with "Bon". Due to its beliefs of ghosts and sexual practices, it became more excessive.

The tantric Master Atiśa spread out the tantric sex teachings in private. Padmasambhava taught it in public, so that the Tibetan Buddhism stands not only apart from Buddhist teachings, but also from Buddhist form. Thus, the Tibetan Buddhism does not belong to Buddhism, and has to be renamed "Lamaism".

   
                  6.Chapter 4 Nectar(4.1-4.3)

Chapter 4

Nectar

 

4.1  The five nectars

Nectar is usually offered to “buddhas,” “bodhisattvas” and dharma-protectors. There are numerous types of nectar in Tibetan Secret Schools, some “extremely inconceivable” to outsiders. In his book, Studying Buddha Dharma through Buddha Dharma, Master Yin-shun said:

When Buddha Sakyamuni was still alive, the supreme offering was to follow the Buddha’s teachings. After His death, offerings became nothing more than lighted lamps, incense and flowers. The disciples of Tibetan Secret Schools worship ghosts and deities, and their offerings include liquor and meat. The so-called “five nectars” are urine, excrement, bone marrow, semen, and menstrual blood. Moreover, there are “five meats”: dog meat, beef, mutton, elephant meat and human flesh. It appears absurd to ask for Buddha’s care and protection with such offerings. [pp. 146-147]

The above records were not fabricated by Master Yin-shun. Such examples of offerings do exist in Tibetan Secret Schools and have been recorded in Yogi Chen’s Literary Work Collections.

Except for the aforementioned twenty-five offerings, there must be five meats and five nectars in the jeweled vase. The five nectars are: 1. the “great fragrance”—the fragrant excrement. The excrement of a practitioner with the achievement of merit and virtue has the scent of sandalwood. 2. the “little fragrance”—the fragrant urine. The urine of a practitioner with the achievement of merit and virtue is fragrant. 3. the brain—the brain of a Tibetan practitioner with the achievement of merit and virtue, preserved after his death, as in a sky funeral (i.e., feeding big birds). 4. the red bodhi—the ovum of a female sky walker (dakini) (the menstrual blood of a female consort), not that of an ordinary woman, or the first menstrual blood of a virgin. 5. the white bodhi—the unejaculated semen obtained in the dual operations of compassion and wisdom of a yoga practitioner with the achievement of merit and virtue and with the realization of the emptiness-nature. The five meats are elephant meat, horse meat, human flesh, pork and dog meat. [32: 678-679]

In Tibetan Secret Schools, the excrement and urine of a guru are treated as nectars and called the great and the little fragrances, respectively. Yogi C. M. Chen said:

When I was once at Lushan, it had been snowing heavily for days and the feces-collector had not shown up for days. The feces bucket of my guru was full and the attendant lamas of my guru complained constantly. When I heard this, I picked up the bucket and walked on the snow to the usual disposal place to discard the contents, then washed and cleaned the bucket and put it back. My guru praised me very much. I reported to my guru, “Even if Guru asks me to eat the excrement, I will not refuse.” The excrement of Guru is the great fragrance and it is my pleasure to smell it. Another time, while I was at the Sino-Tibetan Buddhist College, Master Yan-ding presented me with some pills, which I took right away. Master asked me how I felt and I replied, “A burst of fragrance.” Then Master asked me if I knew what they were. “They must be some kind of tsampa (roasted highland barley flour) mixed with spices,” I replied. Master said, “Tsampa is indeed an ingredient of the pills but the most important blessed ingredient is the little fragrance of ancient lamas.” The little fragrance is the urine. I reported this to my master Kunga, and was about to express my admiration for the pills, Master Kunga could not wait to praise me first, “You have good faith. I knew it when I saw you tasting my urine without reluctance.” Such trivial things were very common in the old days. Even nowadays in Tibet and Xi-kang (in China), those things are still not uncommon. When I once meditated in solitude in a Guan-di temple in Lu-huo, Xi-kang, people came to ask for my urine occasionally. I could never have refused their requests. [34: 732-733]

Nectar is usually used in conjunction with the mandala (treasure-gathering bowl) offering.

In general, there must be 27 offerings in the bowl. These offerings are “Sumeru”, the four continents with the Sun and the Moon, the eight little continents, the seven treasures of the wheel-king, a jeweled vase, treasure mountain, trees, cattle, and rice. Other times there may be as many as 37 offerings. In addition to the above 27 offerings, there may be incense, flowers, lamps, graffiti, frolics, headdresses, songs, dances, eight offering girls, and large and small treasure caps. … The three-body mandala offerings are more than those of other schools. “Five stories” are offered to the dharma-body, reward-body, and embodiment. The entire dharma realm is offered to the dharma-body, which is far beyond the Sumeru and four continents; the permanently tranquil and luminous pure-land is the primary one in it. Five wisdoms, five elements, five meats, five nectars and the red and the white ultimate bodhis are offered to the reward-body. [32: 1034]

The nectars mentioned here are those mentioned before, certainly including the nectars mixed with the great and the little fragrances.

The five nectars also serve other purposes. When making offerings of impure food to “buddhas and bodhisattvas” of Tibetan Secret Schools or giving ghosts food, the five nectars may be used to “cleanse and eliminate” impurities. Tsongkhapa said,

As for the container used for nectars, The Sutra on the Secrets of Union names it the lotus container, which is a skull bowl (made from a human skull, also called a kapala. Refer to the photo on the cover page of this book.). Plates may also be used, as mentioned in An Ear of Grain Caught on the Guru’s Teachings. Platforms or copper trays, in The Red Great Power Sutra, or tile trays, in The Treatise on the Sublime Garland Sutra, may also be used. So, the nature of the offering container is quite flexible. As for the foods, noodles, beans, meat, fish, rice gruel, cakes, liquor, water, green onions, garlic, milk, etc., can be used as offerings, as described in The Treatise on the Sublime Garland Sutra and An Ear of Grain Caught on the Guru’s Teachings. It is also acceptable to use only noodles and water if the complete set of offerings is unavailable. As for the arrangement of the offerings, The Sutra on the Secrets of Union states, “The offerings include Yoga, fish, meat and other foods. The liquors are subsidiary. Other alcoholic drinks can be used as well. The water bowl is placed on the right, and the Yoga in front. All the offerings are cleansed and purified by the five nectars.” The sentence regarding liquors was translated in the Interpreting Treatise as “The liquors can make (them) delightful”. If meat and fish are included, they are arrayed on both sides. As for the cleansing and purifying, An Ear of Grain Caught on the Guru’s Teachings says, “The impurities can be cleansed and purified with nectar pills or by the nectar obtained through tantric practice (through visualizing the obscene liquid, descending in the sexual happy union of the father and the mother deities, to be the nectar).” [21: 531-532]

These five nectars themselves, however, are quite filthy and nasty. How can they be used to cleanse and purify the impurities? It does not make any sense. A wise man should realize this.

 

4.2  Receiving nectar through dhyana

Receiving nectar through “dhyana” (meditation) comprises five categories and is described as follows:

1. Receiving nectar through food or drink: Those who want to take nectar through food “should not eat food that is spicy, too salty, or too hot. Those so called poor quality food such as wild garlic, liquor, sour liquor, rotten meat, fish, seedlings, etc., are also forbidden.” [61: 367] There are five different kinds of food nectar: (1) “The nectar includes the leaves of white garlic, which are not spicy, leaf vegetables, noodles in soup, butter used for medicine, etc. After eating this nectar, one’s veins will gradually loosen up and not stand out on the skin, and achieve the utmost dhyana.” [61: 368] (2) “Chewing a Tibetan fruit and sucking its juice is the key point of the ‘simmering watery milk’ nectar.” [61: 368] (3) “Take some butter, three liters of milk, and 3.75 grams of water. Mix them well and then fry. The water and milk will evaporate. When scorched smoke comes out, take out the nectar and keep it in a clean container. Take a mouthful of it every time when the stomach is empty. Continue eating this way for one year, and one’s veins will not stand out as well.” [61: 368] (4) “Three fruits simmered in honey: Take two-thirds of a Tibetan fruit, one-third of a Fructus Terminaliae Billericae (myrobalan), and a little Phyllanthus emblica, and grind them all together. Then mix them with sugar and grind them into powder. Finally, mix the powder with honey to make pills. Take the pills for one year and one’s veins will not stand out.” [61: 368] (5) “There is also a so-called ‘the great fragrance simmered in honey’: First, follow the above guidelines of eating. Take one’s own great fragrance, obtained after abstinence from food of poor quality, and put it on a clean stone slate. Spread it with a wooden knife and dry it in the air. Mix some honey and butter with a little water; simmer until the water is evaporated. Grind the air-dried great fragrance into powder; then mix these two together and make pills with the size of sheep feces. Take one pill at dawn on the first day of each month. … Continue for one year, and one can attain the achievement of fasting without getting his veins stand out on the skin. All these approaches will become the supreme nectar achievements after the offering of bodhi mind.” [61: 368-369]

2. Receiving nectar through behavior: Those who want to receive this type of nectar must avoid the following behavior to obtain it.

Those behaviors: staying in the raging fire or under the burning sun for a long time, sweating heavily, being exhausted and weakened, or staying up all night through. The key point of the so-called “receiving” nectar through behavior is to continuously practice the lotus-posture sitting and to keep body, speech and mind to be leisurely, unhurried, and away from being frightened. This is the leisurely and carefreely “receiving nectar.” [61: 369]

3. Receiving nectar through Chi: “Practice any one of the seven-branches that a practitioner has learned previously or practice the supreme Chi practice of power at dawn.” [61: 370]

4. Receiving nectar through bright-drop: “Practice any kind of bright-drop yoga. The supreme method, however, is to practice the white-hair-seed at one’s glabella because it can generate the most powerful body force, and one may thus attain dhyana very quickly. For other cultivations, one may practice receiving nectar while sitting.” [61: 370]

5. Receiving nectar through hand-seal (mudra): “Receiving nectar through hand-seal is the same as that in the third empowerment.” [61: 370]

The above includes the nectars which can or can not generate dhyana.

There is another nectar, named “the nectar for obtaining benefits and generating dhyana.” Through this nectar “the tantric dhyana” can be generated and “the greatest benefit of becoming a buddha” can be obtained. This is nothing more than the attainment of the obscene fluid and the associated mental experience through practicing Couple-practice Tantra:

In addition, as stated in the original verse: “the happiness of the five pure aspects.” It is associated with the nectar for “obtaining benefits.” If one wishes to achieve happiness throughout his body, or to have happiness everywhere, one must keep his breath (while practicing Couple-practice Tantra to the state of orgasm), and then take a deep breath, cross the vajra fists over the chest, look up a little bit and get used to the change of views. The five nectars may then be transformed into pure aspects, and happiness will be generated throughout the body. The initial symptom of the fine hair standing up on the skin can only result in a little happiness. Afterwards, the experience of happiness, mixed with pains, shows up remarkably. Next, the feeling of body shaking comes up from the bottom and then spreads over the channels of the entire body. Finally, one may reach a state of the union of emptiness and bliss. When the state remains persistently, everything can be generated. No fault occurs.” [61: 370-371]

There is another nectar with which dhyana can be generated without fault associated with it.

The original verse says, “Receiving nectar without being away from the feelings of the five sense-organs.” “No fault” means that the consciousness concentrates on where the happiness is generated. In addition, practice the key step of guiding tranquility and wrath by words three times. Then, happiness can reach any place or faculty where the pain or happiness was not generated before. The happiness generated from the faculties and the dhyana can stay away from all faults as well. [61: 371]

In other words, at the moment of “the dual operations of bliss and emptiness” or “the union of bliss and emptiness,” the practitioner concentrates on the experience of happiness, he or she may stay away all kinds of greed. And, according to “the key step of guiding tranquility and wrath by words (following the detailed oral teachings of one’s guru)”, the practitioner can experience happiness throughout the faculties of the whole body. If one can concentrate on the happiness and emptiness in this way, remain in such “samaya” and “have no attachment at all”, then one has attained the nectar which can generate dhyana and keep oneself away from all faults. This is another type of “receiving nectar.”

Moreover, nectar may be received in three different ways depending on one’s practice and the level of attainment in “the guiding way of the realm nectar.” (Realm here refers to seed, specifically semen.) These methods of receiving nectar are: the experience of equal and uniform nectar, the experience of increasing power of nectar, and the experience of wide expansion of bright-drop.

 

For the receiving experience of equal and uniform nectar, the original verse says, “The five nectars and the five bodies of Thus-come One are equal”. This means that after self-blessing with the five equal and uniform nectars, and performing the “internal dependently-arising,” one’s experience from outside has three different grades: the highest grade of equality and uniformity is associated with the five Thus-come Ones, the middle grade is associated with the buddha’s sons, buddhisattvas, etc.; the lowest grade is associated with the five-color light, etc., which arises from the response.

 

For the receiving experience of increasing power of nectar, the original verse says, “Silla and the sun.” It is supreme because the menstrual blood obtained from one’s mother is kept and held by the power of the operation in the right blood vessel. After experiencing “the increase of power”, one can attain a feeling of ease with other nectars. … The original verse also says, “Carbu and the moon.” This means that the white bodhi obtained from one’s father is placed at one’s glabella and is kept and held by the power of one’s left seminal channel. After “the increase of power,” one can attain the feeling at ease with other nectars. [61: 478-479]

For the receiving experience of wide expansion of bright-drop, the original verse says, “In the fine channels, there are tiny bright-drops and starlets.” This means that there are tiny bright-drops which spread over and widely expand within the 72,000 fine channels. … Through the explanation of the mundane way, the guiding ways of nectar in the supra-mundane way should be realized. [61: 479-480]

The above three are combined together and named “The Guiding Way of Realm Nectar.” Their sayings are essentially heretical and evil views. After reading the above explanations, the reader will realize the essence of Tibetan Secret Schools, and it will be unnecessary to say more.

 

4.3  Irrational attempts to achieve dhyana through nectar

The practitioners of Tibetan Secret Schools follow the false ideas: attempting to achieve dhyana by means of nectars. For example, the realm nectar mentioned in Section 4.2 is receiving nectar without leaving the feelings of five sense-organs. They wish to achieve dhyana from “receiving nectar” of Couple-practice Tantra (more details in [61: 371]). They also wish to achieve the five bodies of Thus-come One through “the guiding way of realm nectar” (detailed in [61: 478]). However, those approaches of tantric practice have never corresponded to the two true great dharma-doors (practice methods) of nectar told by Buddha Sakyamuni. These two great dharma-doors of nectar are Liberation-way and Buddhahood-way. Since nectar is the best food in the desire-realm heaven, it is used here as an analogy of the best two supra-mundane practice methods. This does not mean that the nectar of desire-realm itself is the best substance to aid in practice.

Nectar, a substance, is a dharma of the desire-realm heaven, and it is essentially the food of the beings in the desire-realm heaven. Such a conditioned dharma in the mundane world is a dharma of food and drink in the desire-realm which is the lowest among the three-realms. Therefore, it is impossible to benefit any practice and realization on the Buddha dharma by means of it. Why do I say that nectar is the dharma of food and drink in the desire-realm heaven? It is because nectar is a tangible food and only exists in the desire-realm heaven. There is no such a dharma in the form or formless realm heavens. So, nectar is the lowest grade dharma in the three-realms. If the reader wants to know all the details, please consult another book of mine, The Nectar and Dharma Rain. Those details will not be repeated here.

Nectar is a conditioned dharma in the desire-realm, but the dharmas of Liberation-way and Buddhahood-way are all unconditioned and beyond the three-realms. How can a conditioned dharma in the desire-realm benefit the unconditioned dharmas that are beyond the three-realms? It does not make any sense. In addition, the dharmas of Liberation-way and Buddhahood-way are all formless; they are purely mental dharmas. Nectar is a material dharma in the desire-realm and is the lowest grade in the three-realms. How can it be an auxiliary condition of the non-material dharmas beyond the three-realms? Nonsense!

The reader should know that the cultivation of Liberation-way, which can help practitioners transcend the three-realms, is purely intended to cut off the self-view and to extinguish the self-attachment. To cut off the self-view, one should start to cut off “the ego of the perceiving mind” that receives the obscene feeling through the “reception of nectar.” One should observe that the perceiving mind which feels pleasure is illusory and unreal. This mind can not travel to future lifetimes, does not come from previous lives, and can only exist for one generation. By performing such observations to cut off the self-view of “the ego of the perceiving mind being true and indestructible,” one can then begin to realize Liberation-way. After that, one should extinguish the self-attachment, and not allow the Manas consciousness, the mind-root, to cling to oneself again. One may never take the Manas, which discerns and thinks all the time (makes all decisions), to be the indestructible mind again. One can then extinguish the self-attachment, and completely realize Liberation-way.

All the concepts of the “realm nectar and receiving nectar” of Tibetan Secret Schools regard the perceiving mind as permanent and indestructible, and as the “nature of emptiness.” The practitioners also observe the “feeling of pleasure” experienced in the dual operations of bliss and emptiness to be formless, colorless and everlasting, and regard it to be the “nature of emptiness.” They wish to permanently keep their perceiving minds in such a state of obscene pleasure and name it the dual operations of bliss and emptiness or the union of bliss and emptiness. In fact, they have not yet cut off the self-view and still cling to the ego. They have not cut off the “attachment to the desire-realm,” not even to mention the “attachment to the form and formless realms”. They think that the realm nectar and receiving nectar can allow practitioners to stay away from the suffering of three-realms and allow them to attain liberation, and call this attained state “the union of samsara and nirvana.” All these are indeed illusive and false thinking.

The final goal of the practice of Buddhahood-way is to attain all-seed-wisdom. The fundamental aspect of the practice and realization of all-seed-wisdom is the personal realization of the way-seed-wisdom. The basis of the way-seed-wisdom is the general-phenomenon-wisdom of prajna that arises from the realization of the eighth consciousnessthe thus-come-store. Hence, the foundation of the Buddha’s bodhi widsom is the personal realization of the eighth consciousnessthe thus-come-store. The ancient and today’s Tibetan gurus and their disciples have not followed the correct way to practice and independently created the nectar dharma that deviates from Buddhahood-way and Liberation-way. They attempt to realize Liberation-way and attain the Buddha’s bodhi wisdom through it. They become the people who seek the dharma outside their minds. Such wrong and evil views will make them permanently isolated from Buddhahood-way and Liberation-way, and from Buddhism as well. After practicing diligently and spending lots of time, money and effort, the practitioners of Tibetan Secret Schools remain ignorant of the true great nectar dharma-doors. What they attempt to find is nothing but the nectar of the desire-realm that is still a flawed and conditioned dharma. Aren’t they stupid indeed? To be wise men, those dharma-kings, living buddhas, rinpoches and the practitioners of Tibetan Secret Schools should think about these issues very carefully.

In addition, there is another type of nectar, practiced through visualization, that can benefit one’s body and mind. Tsongkhapa said:

When one is tired during practicing, an expedient way of recuperation is mentioned by Ran-deng-xian in The Collection of Esotericism: “Visulize that a moon with the seed-syllable Om on top of one’s head drops the uppermost-mind water that satisfies one’s body, speech, and mind; the water should be dropped as described in tantras.” To paraphrase, imagine that a moon disc with seed-syllable Om up above the head drops the nectar and fills the whole body with it; all motes of dust are moistened. The Vajra Auapicious Rice states: “Imagine that one breathes in and out, guides and conjures the nectar flushing from the top.” Discussant Stillness said: “Through the seed-syllable Om, light comes from ten directions. Then the practitioner makes the light enter his body by using his life power. It then operates in the channels all over his body.” [21: 530]

Taking such a visualized nectar as a real substance that can benefit one’s body and mind is very much like a very hungry and poor fool trying to draw cakes on paper to appease his hunger. How can such understanding and views be correct? A wise man should think carefully and will know they are absurd.

 

Though five nectars and five lamps are in such a sequence as described in The Treatise on the Sublime Garland Sutra and An Ear of Grain Caught on the Guru’s Teachings, it is also mentioned in An Ear of Grain Caught on the Guru’s Teachings that, “Fully understanding such behavior, appearance, and the nature of the five wisdoms is the five Thus-come Ones, also known as five lamps or five conjurations.” The five lamps or five conjurations are called the five Thus-come Ones here. A Crop of Teachings also says, “Ratnasambhava, Amitabha, Amoghasiddha, Aksobhya, Vairocana are the five conjurations.” But the sequence is as described here. Therefore, the first five seed-syllables generate the five meats, starting from the center and then going around the four directions from the right. The five seed-syllables of Hum, etc. generate the great meat, etc. in sequence, which are magnificent with the seed-syllables. From the “fire” (southeast) to the “self-existing” (northeast), the four seed-syllables of Zhong, etc. generate the great fragrance, etc., which are magnificent with the seed-syllables. Here the great flesh is combined with the nectar, so only four kinds are mentioned. Some other tantras say that the five nectars are the five buddhas. For example, in The Sutra on Great-Seals, “Ratnasambhava is said to be the blood (the menstrual blood of a woman), Amitabha is said to be the semen, Amoghasiddha is said to be the great flesh (five meats), Aksobhya is said to be the little fragrance (the urine of a great practitioner), Vairocana is said to be the great fragrance (the excrement of a great practitioner). These are the five nectars.” Discussant Ling also said so in his Practicing Method on Supreme Bliss (Sukha), “Hum, Om, Kon, Ow, Dza, little and great fragrances, great flesh, bodhi mind, wonderful flowers, Lung, Man, Ban, Don, beef, dog meat, elephant meat, and horse meat, all are magnificent with seed-syllables.” Master Mao-yi also said so. …

 

The Vinaya Learners Guide describes the fat in meat, the marrow in bones, and the brain in head as the lowest, median and highest grade, respectively. The five meats are also called the five conjurations, or the five lamps, for they can conjure (the five buddhas) and reveal spiritual attainment. Next, imagine that there are Ha, Hor, and Xen in foods, with which the ordinary colors, odors and forces of the foods are purified in sequence and then transformed into wonderful ones. …

 

After that, visualize that the wind moves and the fire burns. Those seed-syllables melt into liquids with the colors of the sunrise. The associated vapor becomes the seed-syllable Hum, which is magnificent with the vajra. The seed-syllables melt three times and fall into the skull bowl and then transform into nectar. Above that, the seed-syllable Om transforms into a moon disc; Om, Ah, and Hum overlapped upright above the moon disc and from them light radiates to conjure the nectar of the bodhi minds of buddhas in ten directions (the obscene liquid that descends from the statue of the reward-body buddha of Couple-practice Tantra) and the nectar of the sea, etc. The nectars enter the three seed-syllables and the moon disc, and then dissolve into the skull. After that, chant the three seed-syllables three times and bless them to be pure like mercury. The above is described in The Headdress Treatise. …

The rites of eating nectar (refer to another book of mine, The Nectar and Dharma Rain, for details) are also stated by Master Mao-yi and Discussant Ling, “The nectars are generated as described above. One is then to imagine that there is quite an amount of white vajra on the tongue roots of the deities, generated from the seed-syllable Hum. From this, light radiates like tubes to suck the nectars. All of them are then full and satisfied. Next, one sprinkles the nectars to offer by thumb and ring finger.” The Illustration on Four Throne Sutra says to “sprinkle at the positions of tongue tip, eyebrows and top of the head.” [21: 532-535]

The above is the sayings of visualized nectars from Tsongkhapa.

 


 


Die Dalai Lamas

»Die Dalai Lamas werden von ihren Anhängern als fortgeschrittene Mahayana Bodhisattvas angesehen, mitfühlende Wesen, die sozusagen ihren eigenen Eintritt in das Nirvana zurückgestellt haben, um der leidenden Menschheit zu helfen. Sie sind demnach auf einem guten Wege zur Buddhaschaft, sie entwickeln Perfektion in ihrer Weisheit und ihrem Mitgefühl zum Wohle aller Wesen. Dies rechtertigt, in Form einer Doktrin, die soziopolitische Mitwirkung der Dalai Lamas, als Ausdruck des mitfühlenden Wunsches eines Bodhisattvas, anderen zu helfen.«

?Hier sollten wir zwei Dinge feststellen, die der Dalai Lama nicht ist: Erstens, er ist nicht in einem einfachen Sinne ein ?Gott-König?. Er mag eine Art König sein, aber er ist kein Gott für den Buddhismus. Zweitens, ist der Dalai Lama nicht das ?Oberhaupt des Tibetischen Buddhismus? als Ganzes. Es gibt zahlreiche Traditionen im Buddhismus. Manche haben ein Oberhaupt benannt, andere nicht. Auch innerhalb Tibets gibt es mehrere Traditionen. Das Oberhaupt der Geluk Tradition ist der Abt des Ganden Klosters, als Nachfolger von Tsong kha pa, dem Begründer der Geluk Tradition im vierzehnten/fünfzehnten Jahrhundert.«

Paul Williams, »Dalai Lama«, in
Clarke, P. B., Encyclopedia of New Religious Movements
(New York: Routledge, 2006), S. 136.

Regierungsverantwortung
der Dalai Lamas

?Nur wenige der 14 Dalai Lamas regierten Tibet und wenn, dann meist nur für einige wenige Jahre.?

(Brauen 2005:6)

»In der Realität dürften insgesamt kaum mehr als fünfundvierzig Jahre der uneingeschränkten Regierungsgewalt der Dalai Lamas zusammenkommen. Die Dalai Lamas sechs und neun bis zwölf regierten gar nicht, die letzten vier, weil keiner von ihnen das regierungsfähige Alter erreichte. Der siebte Dalai Lama regierte uneingeschränkt nur drei Jahre und der achte überhaupt nur widerwillig und auch das phasenweise nicht allein. Lediglich der fünfte und der dreizehnte Dalai Lama können eine nennenswerte Regieruagsbeteiligung oder Alleinregierung vorweisen. Zwischen 1750 und 1950 gab es nur achtunddreißig Jahre, in denen kein Regent regierte!«

Jan-Ulrich Sobisch,
Lamakratie - Das Scheitern einer Regierungsform (PDF), S. 182,
Universität Hamburg

Der Fünfte Dalai Lama,
Ngawang Lobsang Gyatso

Der Fünfte Dalai Lama, Ngawang Lobsang Gyatso

?Der fünfte Dalai Lama, der in der tibetischen Geschichte einfach ?Der Gro?e Fünfte? genannt wird, ist bekannt als der Führer, dem es 1642 gelang, Tibet nach einem grausamen Bürgerkrieg zu vereinigen. Die ?ra des fünften Dalai Lama (in etwa von seiner Einsetzung als Herrscher von Tibet bis zum Beginn des 18. Jahrhunderts, als seiner Regierung die Kontrolle über das Land zu entgleiten begann) gilt als pr?gender Zeitabschnitt bei der Herausbildung einer nationalen tibetischen Identit?t - eine Identit?t, die sich im Wesentlichen auf den Dalai Lama, den Potala-Palast der Dalai Lamas und die heiligen Tempel von Lhasa stützt. In dieser Zeit wandelte sich der Dalai Lama von einer Reinkarnation unter vielen, wie sie mit den verschiedenen buddhistischen Schulen assoziiert waren, zum wichtigsten Beschützer seines Landes. So bemerkte 1646 ein Schriftsteller, dass dank der guten Werke des fünften Dalai Lama ganz Tibet jetzt ?unter dem wohlwollenden Schutz eines wei?en Sonnenschirms zentriert? sei; und 1698 konstatierte ein anderer Schriftsteller, die Regierung des Dalai Lama diene dem Wohl Tibets ganz so wie ein Bodhisattva - der heilige Held des Mahayana Buddhismus - dem Wohl der gesamten Menschheit diene.?

Kurtis R. Schaeffer, »Der Fünfte Dalai Lama Ngawang Lobsang Gyatso«, in
DIE DALAI LAMAS: Tibets Reinkarnation des Bodhisattva Avalokite?vara,
ARNOLDSCHE Art Publishers,
Martin Brauen (Hrsg.), 2005, S. 65

Der Fünfte Dalai Lama:
Beurteilungen seiner Herrschaft I

?Gem?? der meisten Quellen war der [5.] Dalai Lama nach den Ma?st?ben seiner Zeit ein recht toleranter und gütiger Herrscher.?

Paul Williams, »Dalai Lama«, in
(Clarke, 2006, S. 136)

?Rückblickend erscheint Lobsang Gyatso, der ?Gro?e Fünfte?, dem Betrachter als überragende, allerdings auch als widersprüchliche Gestalt.?

Karl-Heinz Golzio / Pietro Bandini,
»Die vierzehn Wiedergeburten des Dalai Lama«,
O.W. Barth Verlag, 1997, S. 118

»Einmal an der Macht, zeigte er den anderen Schulen gegenüber beträchtliche Großzügigkeit. […] Ngawang Lobsang Gyatso wird von den Tibetern der ›Große Fünfte‹ genannt, und ohne jeden Zweifel war er ein ungewöhnlich kluger, willensstarker und doch gleichzeitig großmütiger Herrscher.«

Per Kvaerne, »Aufstieg und Untergang einer klösterlichen Tradition«, in:
Berchert, Heinz; Gombrich, Richard (Hrsg.):
»Der Buddhismus. Geschichte und Gegenwart«,
München 2000, S. 320

Der Fünfte Dalai Lama:
Beurteilungen seiner Herrschaft II

?Viele Tibeter gedenken insbesondere des V. Dalai Lama bis heute mit tiefer Ehrfurcht, die nicht allein religi?s, sondern mehr noch patriotisch begründet ist: Durch gro?es diplomatisches Geschick, allerdings auch durch nicht immer skrupul?sen Einsatz machtpolitischer und selbst milit?rischer Mittel gelang es Ngawang Lobzang Gyatso, dem ?Gro?en Fünften?, Tibet nach Jahrhunderten des Niedergangs wieder zu einen und in den Rang einer bedeutenden Regionalmacht zurückzuführen. Als erster Dalai Lama wurde er auch zum weltlichen Herrscher Tibets proklamiert. Unter seiner ?gide errang der Gelugpa-Orden endgültig die Vorherrschaft über die rivalisierenden lamaistischen Schulen, die teilweise durch blutigen Bürgerkrieg und inquisitorische Verfolgung unterworfen oder au?er Landes getrieben wurden.

Jedoch kehrte der Dalai Lama in seiner zweiten Lebenshälfte, nach Festigung seiner Macht und des tibetischen Staates, zu einer Politik der Mäßigung und Toleranz zurück, die seinem Charakter eher entsprach als die drastischen Maßnahmen, durch die er zur Herrschaft gelangte. Denn Ngawang Lobzang Gyatso war nicht nur ein Machtpolitiker und überragender Staatsmann, sondern ebenso ein spiritueller Meister mit ausgeprägter Neigung zu tantrischer Magie und lebhaftem Interesse auch an den Lehren andere lamaistischer Orden. Zeitlebens empfing er, wie die meisten seiner Vorgänger, gebieterische Gesichte, die er gegen Ende seines Lebens in seinen ›Geheimen Visionen‹ niederlegte.«

(Golzio, Bandini 1997: 95)

Der Dreizehnte Dalai Lama,
Thubten Gyatso

Der Dreizehnte Dalai Lama, Thubten Gyatso

?Ein anderer, besonders wichtiger Dalai Lama war der Dreizehnte (1876-1933). Als starker Herrscher versuchte er, im Allgemeinen ohne Erfolg, Tibet zu modernisieren. ?Der gro?e Dreizehnte? nutzte den Vorteil des schwindenden Einflusses China im 1911 beginnenden Kollaps dessen Monarchie, um faktisch der vollst?ndigen nationalen Unabh?ngigkeit Tibets von China Geltung zu verschaffen. Ein Fakt, den die Tibeter von jeher als Tatsache erachtet haben.?

Paul Williams, »Dalai Lama«, in
(Clarke, 2006, S. 137)

?Manche m?gen sich vielleicht fragen, wie die Herrschaft des Dalai Lama im Vergleich mit europ?ischen oder amerikanischen Regierungschefs einzusch?tzen ist. Doch ein solcher Vergleich w?re nicht gerecht, es sei denn, man geht mehrere hundert Jahre in der europ?ischen Geschichte zurück, als Europa sich in demselben Zustand feudaler Herrschaft befand, wie es in Tibet heutzutage der Fall ist. Ganz sicher w?ren die Tibeter nicht glücklich, wenn sie auf dieselbe Art regiert würden wie die Menschen in England; und man kann wahrscheinlich zu Recht behaupten, dass sie im Gro?en und Ganzen glücklicher sind als die V?lker Europas oder Amerikas unter ihren Regierungen. Mit der Zeit werden gro?e Ver?nderungen kommen; aber wenn sie nicht langsam vonstatten gehen und die Menschen nicht bereit sind, sich anzupassen, dann werden sie gro?e Unzufriedenheit verursachen. Unterdessen l?uft die allgemeine Verwaltung Tibets in geordneteren Bahnen als die Verwaltung Chinas; der tibetische Lebensstandard ist h?her als der chinesische oder indische; und der Status der Frauen ist in Tibet besser als in beiden genannten L?ndern.?

Sir Charles Bell, »Der Große Dreizehnte:
Das unbekannte Leben des XIII. Dalai Lama von Tibet«,
Bastei Lübbe, 2005, S. 546

Der Dreizehnte Dalai Lama:
Beurteilungen seiner Herrschaft

?War der Dalai Lama im Gro?en und Ganzen ein guter Herrscher? Dies k?nnen wir mit Sicherheit bejahen, auf der geistlichen ebenso wie auf der weltlichen Seite. Was erstere betrifft, so hatte er die komplizierte Struktur des tibetischen Buddhismus schon als kleiner Junge mit ungeheurem Eifer studiert und eine au?ergew?hnliche Gelehrsamkeit erreicht. Er verlangte eine strengere Befolgung der m?nchischen Regeln, veranlasste die M?nche, ihren Studien weiter nachzugehen, bek?mpfte die Gier, Faulheit und Korruption unter ihnen und verminderte ihren Einfluss auf die Politik. So weit wie m?glich kümmerte er sich um die zahllosen religi?sen Bauwerke. In summa ist ganz sicher festzuhalten, dass er die Spiritualit?t des tibetischen Buddhismus vergr??ert hat.

Auf der weltlichen Seite stärkte er Recht und Gesetz, trat in engere Verbindung mit dem Volk, führte humanere Grundsätze in Verwaltung und Justiz ein und, wie oben bereits gesagt, verringerte die klösterliche Vorherrschaft in weltlichen Angelegenheiten. In der Hoffnung, damit einer chinesischen Invasion vorbeugen zu können, baute er gegen den Widerstand der Klöster eine Armee auf; vor seiner Herrschaft gab es praktisch keine Armee. In Anbetracht der sehr angespannten tibetischen Staatsfinanzen, des intensiven Widerstands der Klöster und anderer Schwierigkeiten hätte er kaum weiter gehen können, als er es tat.

Im Verlauf seiner Regierung beendete der Dalai Lama die chinesische Vorherrschaft in dem großen Teil Tibets, den er beherrschte, indem er chinesische Soldaten und Beamte daraus verbannte. Dieser Teil Tibets wurde zu einem vollkommen unabhängigen Königreich und blieb dies auch während der letzten 20 Jahre seines Lebens.«

Sir Charles Bell in (Bell 2005: 546-47)

Der Vierzehnte Dalai Lama,
Tenzin Gyatso

Der Vierzehnte Dalai Lama, Tenzin Gyatso

?Der jetzige vierzehnte Dalai Lama (Tenzin Gyatso) wurde 1935 geboren. Die Chinesen besetzten Tibet in den frühen 1950er Jahren, der Dalai Lama verlie? Tibet 1959. Er lebt jetzt als Flüchtling in Dharamsala, Nordindien, wo er der Tibetischen Regierung im Exil vorsteht. Als gelehrte und charismatische Pers?nlichkeit, hat er aktiv die Unabh?ngigkeit seines Landes von China vertreten. Durch seine h?ufigen Reisen, Belehrungen und Bücher macht er den Buddhismus bekannt, engagiert sich für den Weltfrieden sowie für die Erforschung von Buddhismus und Wissenschaft. Als Anwalt einer ?universellen Verantwortung und eines guten Herzens?, erhielt er den Nobelpreis im Jahre 1989.?

Paul Williams, »Dalai Lama«, in
(Clarke, 2006, S. 137)

Moralische Legitimation
der Herrschaft Geistlicher

Für Sobisch ist die moralische Legitimation der Herrschaft Geistlicher ?außerordentlich zweifelhaft?. Er konstatiert:

?Es zeigte sich auch in Tibet, da? moralische Integrit?t nicht automatisch mit der Zugeh?rigkeit zu einer Gruppe von Menschen erlangt wird, sondern allein auf pers?nlichen Entscheidungen basiert. Vielleicht sind es ?hnliche überlegungen gewesen, die den derzeitigen, vierzehnten Dalai Lama dazu bewogen haben, mehrmals unmi?verst?ndlich zu erkl?ren, da? er bei einer Rückkehr in ein freies Tibet kein politische Amt mehr übernehmen werde. Dies ist, so meine ich, keine schlechte Nachricht. Denn dieser Dalai Lama hat bewiesen, da? man auch ohne ein international anerkanntes politisches Amt inne zu haben durch ein glaubhaft an ethischen Grunds?tzen ausgerichtetes beharrliches Wirken einen enormen Einfluss in der Welt ausüben kann.?

Jan-Ulrich Sobisch,
Lamakratie - Das Scheitern einer Regierungsform (PDF), S. 190,
Universität Hamburg